Model Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah di Wilayah Kepulauan dan Perbatasan: Peran Kepemimpinan Adaptif dan Reformasi Tata Kelola di Kabupaten Natuna
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpd.v4i2.675Keywords:
Kepemimpinan Adaptif, Reformasi Birokrasi, Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah, Wilayah Kepulauan, Wilayah Perbatasan, NatunaAbstract
Studi ini menganalisis model kinerja pemerintah daerah di wilayah kepulauan dan perbatasan dengan menempatkan kepemimpinan adaptif dan reformasi tata kelola sebagai variabel penjelas utama. Studi dilakukan di Kabupaten Natuna, Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia, wilayah geografi kepulauan, kendala konektivitas dan posisi strategis sebagai daerah perbatasan nasional. Dengan menggunakan desain kuantitatif eksploratif, studi menggunakan Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) untuk data survei dari 78 responden masyarakat setempat di 17 distrik. Temuan menunjukkan kepemimpinan adaptif memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pemerintah daerah. Reformasi tata kelola juga memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan serta memberikan kontribusi yang lebih kuat daripada kepemimpinan adaptif. Secara bersamaan, kedua variabel tersebut menjelaskan kinerja pemerintah daerah secara substansial, khususnya dalam hal efektivitas pelayanan publik, responsivitas terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat, pencapaian program pembangunan, dan akuntabilitas kinerja. Hasil ini menunjukkan peningkatan kinerja pemerintah daerah di wilayah kepulauan tidak dapat hanya bergantung pada kapasitas kepemimpinan; hal itu juga membutuhkan sistem tata kelola yang akuntabel, transparan, terkoordinasi, dan berbasis data. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi pada kajian administrasi publik dengan menawarkan model kinerja yang dikontekstualisasikan untuk pemerintah daerah yang beroperasi di wilayah perbatasan yang terfragmentasi secara geografis dan sensitif secara strategis.
References
Ahsani, R. D. P., Wulandari, C., Dinata, C., Azmi, N. A., & Fathani, A. T. (2022). The Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Community-Based Tourism in Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i4.16232
Andrews, M. (2008). The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory. Oxford Development Studies, 36(4), 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810802455120
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2011). Strategy Implementation and Public Service Performance. Administration & Society, 43(6), 643–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711412730
Andrews, R., Boyne, G., & Walker, R. M. (2011). The Impact of Management on Administrative and Survey Measures of Organizational Performance. Public Management Review, 13(2), 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532968
Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693002
Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug027
Boyne, George A., & Walker, R. M. (2010). Strategic Management and Public Service Performance: The Way Ahead. Public Administration Review, 70(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02271.x
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun021
Fathani, A. T., Pribadi, U., Suling, C. F., & Azmi, N. A. (2022). Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi Desa ( SID ) terhadap Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik di Desa Dlingo, Bantul, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi, 10(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v10i1.44347
Fathani, A. T., Putera, R. E., & Mohamed, N. (2024). The Perils of Bureaucratic Inertia: A Step Towards Enhancing Government. Jurnal Trias Politika, 8(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v8i1.5976
Fernandes, A. A. R., & Fresly, J. (2017). Modeling of role of public leader, open government information and public service performance in Indonesia. Journal of Management Development, 36(9), 1160–1169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0322
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What Is Governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Season? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Kochanova, A., Hasnain, Z., & Larson, B. (2020). Does E-Government Improve Government Capacity? Evidence from Tax Compliance Costs, Tax Revenue, and Public Procurement Competitiveness. The World Bank Economic Review, 34(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx024
Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and Community Co-Production of Public Services: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? International Journal of Public Administration, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559
Madubun, J. (2024). Public services in island sub‐districts: Towards geography‐based governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12586
Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The Role of Organizations in Fostering Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00695.x
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Kinder, T., & Vidal, I. (2015). The SERVICE Framework: A Public‐service‐dominant Approach to Sustainable Public Services. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12094
Putera, R. E., Fathani, A. T., Lenggogeni, S., & Valentina, T. R. (2026). Unpacking Political Dilemmas in Tourism Governance: Accountability, Transparency and Resource Allocation in Mandalika, Indonesia. Tourism and Hospitality, 7(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp7020048
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2017). Complexity leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 46(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.12.001
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Wardhani, R., Rossieta, H., & Martani, D. (2017). Good governance and the impact of government spending on performance of local government in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 3(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.082503
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., Becker, M., & Müller, W. M. (2022). Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2381–2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8
Zaenuddin, M. (2025). How to Achieve the Integration From the Dualism of Institutional Conflicts? Lesson Learned From Batam, Indonesia. SAGE Open, 15(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251365467
Zaenuddin, M., & Tibrani, T. (2026). Exploring policy innovation performance through transformational leadership and collaborative governance flexibility in Batam, Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 12(2), 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100798
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cen Sui Lan, Tibrani Tibrani, Ramon Zamora, Hanafi Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa JMPD berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di JMPD.
