Model Tata Kelola Pengamanan Kantor Walikota Batam oleh Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja: Koordinasi dan Akuntabilitasi

Authors

  • Raja Mhd Kamil Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam, Indonesia
  • Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam, Indonesia
  • Dwi Afni Maileni Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam, Indonesia
  • Indra Sakti Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jhesm.v4i3.783

Keywords:

Akuntabilitas, Pemerintahan, Koordinasi Hukum, Koordinasi Operasional, Modified Delphi, Satpol PP, Batam

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan merumuskan model tata kelola pengamanan kantor walikota Batam oleh satuan polisi pamong praja yang menekankan koordinasi dan akuntabilitas. Permasalahan penelitian berangkat dari kebutuhan mengintegrasikan kejelasan mandat, komunikasi lintas unit, kesiapsiagaan operasional dan pertanggungjawaban dalam pengamanan objek pemerintahan yang tetap terbuka bagi pelayanan publik. Penelitian menggunakan metode Modified Delphi dua putaran dengan melibatkan 22 panel dari unsur Satpol PP/BKO, Sekretariat Daerah dan pengelola gedung, kepolisian atau praktisi pengamanan, akademisi, serta praktisi manajemen risiko dan pengawasan. Instrumen awal terdiri atas empat dimensi dan 20 indikator. Data dianalisis menggunakan median, interquartile range, persentase persetujuan, Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance dan analisis tematik terhadap komentar panel. Putaran pertama menghasilkan 13 indikator yang langsung diterima dan tujuh indikator yang direvisi. Pada putaran kedua, seluruh 20 indikator memenuhi kriteria konsensus. Kejelasan mandat dan struktur pengamanan memperoleh konsensus substantif tertinggi, sedangkan koordinasi dan komunikasi operasional ditempatkan sebagai prioritas penerapan utama. Nilai Kendall’s W sebesar 0,61 dengan p < 0,001 menunjukkan keselarasan panel yang substansial dan signifikan. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa efektivitas pengamanan tidak hanya ditentukan oleh jumlah personel atau ketegasan tindakan, tetapi oleh integrasi mandat, arus informasi, kesiapan berbasis risiko, dokumentasi keputusan dan evaluasi berkelanjutan. Model menawarkan kerangka operasional untuk penyempurnaan SOP, latihan lintas unit, protokol eskalasi dan akuntabilitas pengamanan kantor pemerintahan daerah

References

Abbas, R., & Miller, T. (2025). Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 120, 105393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105393

Barrios, M., Guilera, G., Nuño, L., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2021). Consensus in the delphi method: What makes a decision change? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120484

Beiderbeck, D., Frevel, N., von der Gracht, H. A., Schmidt, S. L., & Schweitzer, V. M. (2021). Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements. MethodsX, 8, 101401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401

Cedergren, A., & Hassel, H. (2024). Building organizational adaptive capacity in the face of crisis: Lessons from a public sector case study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 100, 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104235

Chang, K., & Wang, W.-J. (2021). Ranking the collaborative competencies of local emergency managers: An analysis of researchers and practitioners’ perceptions in Taiwan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55, 102090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102090

Dimitrijevska-Markoski, T., Nukpezah, J. A., & Azhar, A. (2024). Service Delivery During Crises: The Effects of Organizational Capacity, Collaboration, and Public Service Motivation on Organizational Resilience. Public Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/07349149241262596

Fathani, A. T., Azmi, N. A., Purnomo, E. P., Tham, S. A., & Ahmad, R. (2023). A Systematic Review of Tourism Governance: Sustainable Tourism Governance Model Post COVID-19. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i1.1125

Gattrell, W. T., Logullo, P., van Zuuren, E. J., Price, A., Hughes, E. L., Blazey, P., Winchester, C. C., Tovey, D., Goldman, K., Hungin, A. P., & Harrison, N. (2024). ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLOS Medicine, 21(1), e1004326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326

George, B., Klijn, E. H., Ropes, E., & Sattlegger, A. (2024). Do network management and trust matter for network outcomes? A meta-analysis and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(11), 3270–3297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2327629

Graf, F., Lenz, A., & Eckhard, S. (2024). Ready, set, crisis – transitioning to crisis mode in local public administration. Public Management Review, 26(7), 2039–2063. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2242851

Hansen, S. T., & Antonsen, S. (2024). Taking connectedness seriously. A research agenda for holistic safety and security risk governance. Safety Science, 173, 106436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106436

Jalonen, H. (2025). Epistemic Governance in the Context of Crisis: A Complexity-informed Approach. Administration & Society, 57(2), 218–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997241303935

Jiao, Y., Li, C., Yao, Z., Weng, C., Lian, A., & Dong, R. (2024). How can online citizen complaints provide solutions to refine environmental management: A spatio-temporal perspective. Information Processing & Management, 61(2), 103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103611

Jurnali, T., & Siti-Nabiha, A. K. (2015). Performance Management System for Local Government: The Indonesian Experience. Global Business Review, 16(3), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915569923

Kapucu, N., & Demiroz, F. (2011). Measuring Performance for Collaborative Public Management Using Network Analysis Methods and Tools. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(4), 549–579. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576340406

Kårtvedt, L. E. (2024). Explaining Coordination Quality in Public Service Delivery. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2315016

Kathage, R., Brooks, D. J., & Coole, M. (2024). Decision-making in balancing fire safety hazards against security threats within the built environment. Security Journal, 37(4), 1546–1575. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-024-00431-7

Kim, S. H., Ra, K. H., Lee, S. H., & Lee, D. S. (2024). Does citizen opinion matter? An analysis of police officers’ support for democratic policing in South Korea. Policing: An International Journal, 47(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-09-2023-0112

Krogh, A. H., & Triantafillou, P. (2024). Developing New Public Governance as a public management reform model. Public Management Review, 26(10), 3040–3056. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2313539

Mendez, N. M. (2024). Do Collaborative Management Actions Lead to Better Organizational Outcomes? International Journal of Public Administration, 47(15), 1059–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2256994

Mu, R., & Cui, T. (2024). Facilitating inter-municipal collaboration through mandated collaborative platform: evidence from regional environmental protection in China. Public Management Review, 26(6), 1684–1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2212261

Mulyani, S., Dewi, R., Ahsani, P., & Wijaya, D. N. (2021). Collaborative Governance on Ecotourism : Towards Sustainable Tourism Development. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(148), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.jba.v17i3.958

Natan-Krup, D., & Mizrahi, S. (2024). Public Accountability and Bureaucratic Discretion: Why do Internal Auditors Stretch the Boundaries of Their Role? The American Review of Public Administration, 54(8), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241265893

Olsén, M., Oskarsson, P.-A., Hallberg, N., Granåsen, M., & Nordström, J. (2023). Exploring collaborative crisis management: A model of essential capabilities. Safety Science, 162, 106092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106092

Putera, R. E., Fathani, A. T., Lenggogeni, S., & Asrinaldi. (2025). Tourism disaster management dilemmas: Insights from Mandalika, Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11(January), 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101400

Putera, R. E., Fathani, A. T., Lenggogeni, S., & Valentina, T. R. (2026). Unpacking Political Dilemmas in Tourism Governance: Accountability, Transparency and Resource Allocation in Mandalika, Indonesia. Tourism and Hospitality, 7(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp7020048

Ro, B., & Garfin, G. (2024). Participatory Risk Governance for Seoul, South Korea’s Flood Risk Management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 15(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00552-y

Salomo, R. V., & Rahmayanti, K. P. (2023). Progress and Institutional Challenges on Local Governments Performance Accountability System Reform in Indonesia. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231196659

Sancino, A., & Tasselli, S. (2024). Public service management during the Covid-19 lockdown: a qualitative study. Public Management Review, 26(11), 3227–3245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2318336

Schifano, J., & Niederberger, M. (2025). How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review. Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02738-3

Scholta, H., Halsbenning, S., & Niemann, M. (2025). A coordination perspective on digital public services in federal states. Government Information Quarterly, 42(1), 101984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101984

Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K., & Zyzak, B. (2025). Digital Technologies in Public Administration Networks: Systematic Literature Review and Research Avenues. Administration & Society, 57(8–9), 1051–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997251369090

Steen, R., Roud, E., Mikkelrud Torp, T., & Hansen, T.-A. (2024). The impact of interorganizational collaboration on the viability of disaster response operations: The Gjerdrum landslide in Norway. Safety Science, 173, 106459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106459

Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., & de Jong, J. (2025). Performance Management in Collaborative Governance: A Review of the Literature and Synthesis of the Challenges. Public Performance & Management Review, 48(4), 735–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2510973

Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2021). Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389

Ye, Y., Lin, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., & Han, Z. (2024). Public Servants’ Accountability Pressure When Facing the Pandemic: The Moderating Role of Accountability Awareness. Sage Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241297601

Zaenuddin, M. (2025). How to Achieve the Integration From the Dualism of Institutional Conflicts? Lesson Learned From Batam, Indonesia. SAGE Open, 15(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251365467

Zhang, X., Wang, C., Wang, W., & Zhang, H. (2023). Inter-organizational collaboration after institutional reform in China: A perspective based on the revision of the emergency plan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 98, 104084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104084

Published

2026-08-29