Kinerja Penegakan Hukum Lapangan Satpol PP BKO Kecamatan Lubuk Baja Kota Batam: Model Prediktif Berbasis Kejelasan Mandat, Deteksi Dini, dan Koordinasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpd.v4i3.780Keywords:
Satpol PP, Penegakan Hukum Lapangan, Deteksi Dini, Koordinasi Kecamatan, SmartPLSAbstract
Abstrak: Penelitian ini menganalisis kinerja penegakan hukum lapangan Satpol PP BKO Kecamatan Lubuk Baja Kota Batam melalui model prediktif yang menempatkan kejelasan mandat BKO, deteksi dini gangguan ketertiban, dan koordinasi kecamatan sebagai variabel eksogen. Studi ini penting karena penegakan ketertiban umum di tingkat kecamatan tidak hanya bergantung pada keberadaan aparatur, tetapi juga pada kejelasan ruang tugas, kemampuan membaca potensi gangguan, serta keterhubungan kerja antarunit pemerintahan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis SmartPLS terhadap 87 responden yang terdiri atas personel Satpol PP, aparatur kecamatan dan kelurahan, unsur keamanan wilayah, pelaku usaha, dan masyarakat. Instrumen penelitian disusun menggunakan skala Likert lima poin dan diuji melalui evaluasi outer model, validitas diskriminan, inner model, serta bootstrapping. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa seluruh konstruk memenuhi kriteria validitas dan reliabilitas. Nilai R-square sebesar 0,683 menunjukkan bahwa ketiga variabel eksogen mampu menjelaskan 68,3% variasi kinerja penegakan hukum lapangan. Deteksi dini gangguan ketertiban menjadi prediktor paling dominan dengan koefisien 0,331, diikuti kejelasan mandat BKO sebesar 0,294 dan koordinasi kecamatan sebesar 0,287. Seluruh hubungan terbukti positif dan signifikan. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa kinerja Satpol PP BKO lebih efektif ketika didukung oleh mandat operasional yang jelas, sistem pencegahan berbasis informasi wilayah, dan koordinasi lokal yang terstruktur. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan pedoman BKO, pengembangan sistem deteksi dini, serta penyusunan indikator kinerja yang menilai ketepatan respons, legalitas tindakan, keberlanjutan tindak lanjut, dan keteraturan ruang publik secara lebih menyeluruh, adaptif, dan terukur dalam tata kelola pemerintahan kecamatan sekaligus praktik hukum administrasi perkotaan berbasis kebutuhan masyarakat lokal di Kota Batam berkelanjutan.
References
Anto, A., Hutasoit, I., Maileni, D. A., & Riyanto, A. (2026). Evaluasi Kinerja Bidang Ketertiban Umum Satpol PP dalam Penegakan Peraturan Daerah: Studi Kasus di Batam, Kepualauan Riau. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 6(3), 2335–2347. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i3.7941
Basher, R. (2006). Global early warning systems for natural hazards: systematic and people-centred. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364(1845), 2167–2182. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1819
Batam, B. (2024). Kecamatan Lubuk Baja Dalam Angka 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Batam.
Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug027
Brodkin, E. Z. (2006). Bureaucracy Redux: Management Reformism and the Welfare State. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj019
Buffat, A. (2015). Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government. Public Management Review, 17(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771699
Chang, A., & Brewer, G. A. (2023). Street-Level bureaucracy in public administration: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2191–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065517
Du, C., & Zhu, S. (2012). Research on Urban Public Safety Emergency Management Early Warning System based on Technologies for the Internet of Things. Procedia Engineering, 45, 748–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.234
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Gassner, D., & Gofen, A. (2018). Street-Level Management: A Clientele-Agent Perspective on Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy051
Gilboa, S., Shirom, A., Frien, Y., & Cooper, C. (2008). A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 227–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-Level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(1), 16–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90020-2
Junaedi, G. S. (2022). Peran Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja Dalam Penegakan Peraturan Daerah di Kabupaten Sukabumi. Jurnal Tatapamong, 4(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.33701/jurnaltatapamong.v4i2.2589
Kårtvedt, L. E. (2024). Explaining Coordination Quality in Public Service Delivery. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2315016
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Lee, E. (2025). Assessing Innovation and Performance in Public Services: Impact on Citizen Satisfaction in Local Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.2507971
May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030
Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., Ting, H., & Cheah, J.-H. (2024). Purposive Sampling: A Review and Guidelines for Quantitative Research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01
Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x
Nielsen, P. A. (2014). Performance Management, Managerial Authority, and Public Service Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut025
Panday, P. K., & Chowdhury, S. (2020). Responsiveness of local government officials: insights and lessons from participatory planning and budgeting. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1742753
Parker, C. (2006). The “Compliance” Trap: The Moral Message in Responsive Regulatory Enforcement. Law & Society Review, 40(3), 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00274.x
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja, (2018).
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001
Romi, A., Helen, Z., & Arliman, L. (2025). Efektivitas penegakan peraturan daerah tentang ketertiban umum di Kabupaten Pasaman Barat: studi kasus penertiban izin tempat makan. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 4(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.31933/p8v4ay40.
Rossi, P., Tuurnas, S., & Stenvall, J. (2025). Street-level bureaucrats as policymakers in the implementation of information system in social services. Public Management Review, 27(3), 702–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2362247
Sorensen, J. H. (2000). Hazard Warning Systems: Review of 20 Years of Progress. Natural Hazards Review, 1(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119)
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
Tubre, T. C., & Collins, J. M. (2000). Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance. Journal of Management, 26(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600104
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/652233
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibrahim Ridwan Hasibuan, Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti, Dwi Afni Maileni, Agus Riyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa JMPD berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di JMPD.
